Text

It starts with time

I enjoy some creative writing, so this blogs theme will be explored with poems and the sort also;

A moment

The path forwards is one

slated with pavements of time

building paths, networks, road

forward for all that exists

Light, and the rest, including ourselves

walk along these invisible paths

onward to discovery.

I’m a sentient, a filter, and as time proceeds before me

to path my life before me, it too proceeds around me

moving throw me, and every cell within me, present in front

of their paths too.

We, in a sense will forever be the built by the measure of time

our future, our past, and everything forever will be in hold of the infinitive

that is the future.

Ok so that’s less of a poem and more of a prose, but hey it’s not easy!

Text

An Idea!

I have stumbled on an understanding I’m going to research. The concept Of futurism isn’t just technologically based, it’s something that has entered our lives on a minute to minute time frame. In essence it suggest that progression to the next moment in time is futurism at its core. We forever are moving to the next day unable to change the path of time, and thus locked into the future right now, in the next second, and the moments that follow to our deaths. It is from that point that I will begin sharing ideas about what I see for static points in our future.

Tags: the future
Link

The article below is fantfreakingtastic! Glad I quit smoking! It all makes amazing sense also. Because it’s a long read ill keep this short; My calming habits: I actually dont think I have any; And until recently realized I need some, so that I’m working on; But what I can identify in my behaviors is that I have places I’m most comfortable to do my “wandering”. On my walk to the train station, ill do my daily thinking, and I find that by the time I get to the train station, I don’t need to think anymore, or I find myself relatively complacent, that a book or something else becomes of interest. This also works in the shower, and usually by the time my shower is done so is the wandering.

mindfulwellness:

Great article! 

Most people do what they have to do to get through the day. Though this may sound dire, let’s face it, it’s the human condition. Given the number of people who are depressed or anxious, it’s not surprising that big pharma is doing as well as it is. But for millennia before we turned to government-approved drugs, humans devised clever ways of coping: Taking a walk, eating psychedelic mushrooms, breathing deeply, snorting things, praying, running, smoking, and meditating are just some of the inventive ways humans have found to deal with the unhappy rovings of their minds.

Most people would agree that a lot of our unhappiness comes from the mind’s annoying chatter, which includes obsessions, worries, drifts from this stress to that stress, and our compulsive and exhausting need to anticipate the future. Not surprisingly, the goal of most adults is to get the mind to shut up, calm down, and chill out. For this reason, we turn to our diverse array of feel-good tools (cigarettes, deep breathing, and what have you). Some are healthier and more effective than others, and researchers are finally understanding why certain methods break the cycle and others exacerbate it.But which methods actually work?

Last year, a Harvard study confirmed that there’s a clear connection between mind wandering and unhappiness. Not only did  the study find that if you’re awake, your mind is wandering almost half the time, it also found that this wandering is linked to a less happy state. (You can actually use the iPhone app used in the study to track your own happiness.) This is not surprising, since when your mind is wandering, it’s not generally to the sweet things in your life: More likely, it’s to thoughts like why your electric bill was so high, why your boss was rude to you today, or why your ex-husband is being so difficult.

Another study found that mind wandering is linked to activation of network of brain cells called the default mode network (DMN), which is active not when we’re doing high-level processing, but when we’re drifting about in “self-referential” thoughts (read: when our brain is flitting from one life-worry to the next).

Meditation is an interesting method for increasing one’s sense of happiness because not only has it stood the test of time, but it’s also been tested quite extensively in the lab. Part of the effect of mindfulness meditation is to quiet the mind by acknowledging non-judgmentally and then relinquishing (rather than obsessing about) unhappy or stress-inducing thoughts.

New research by Judson Brewer, MD, PhD and his group at Yale Universityhas found that experienced meditators not only report less mind wandering during meditation, but actually have markedly decreased activity in their DMN. Earlier research had shown that meditators have less activity in regions governing thoughts about the self, like the medial prefrontal cortex: Brewer says that what’s likely going on in experienced meditators is that these “‘me’ centers of the brain are being deactivated.

They also found that when the brain’s “me” centers were being activated, meditators also co-activated areas important in self-monitoring and cognitive control, which may indicate that they are on the constant lookout for “me” thoughts or mind-wandering – and when their minds do wander, they bring them back to the present moment. Even better, meditators not only did this during meditation, but when not being told to do anything in particular. This suggests that they may have formed a new default mode: one that is more present-centered (and less “me”-centered), no matter what they are doing.

“This is really cool,” Brewer says.” As far as we know, nobody has seen this type of connectivity pattern before. These networks have previously been shown to be anti-correlated.”

So is being happy all about shifting our tendency away from focus on ourselves? Research in other areas, like neurotheology (literally the neurology of religion), suggests that there may be something to this. Andy Newberg, MD at the University of Pennsylvania has found that both in meditating monks and in praying nuns, areas of the brain important in concentration and attention were activated, while areas that govern how a person relates to the external world were deactivated. These findings may suggest that for people who practice meditation or prayer, the focus becomes less on the self as a distinct entity from the external world, and more on connection between the two.  This reflects the idea discussed earlier where shifting attention from inside to outside is at least part of what quells unhappiness.

What about using other tools like cigarettes, food, or alcohol, as a method for finding pleasure and calming the mind? Don’t these things take a person outside of him or herself, and move the focus from the inner world of stressful thoughts to something outside, or “other”? Looking forward to the next hit of caffeine, nicotine, or coke might seem like a valid method of moving attention from the inside to the outside, but if you look closer, it actually intensifies the unpleasantness.

Brewer uses the example of smoking to illustrate why addiction fuels negative thoughts rather than abates them. In addition to the pleasurable associations, smoking actually creates a negative feedback loop, where you are linking stress and craving with the oh-so-good act of smoking. So whenever you experience a negative emotion, craving returns and intensifies over time, so that you are actually even less happy than before. A cigarette may quiet the mind temporarily – during the act of smoking – but in between cigarettes is where things get bad, because craving creeps in. Though we’re using craving as the example, unhappiness, self-referential thoughts, or everyday worries can all be substituted in.


So if you’re dealing with unhappiness of any kind, whether it’s every day worries, or more severe depression or anxiety, the method you choose for coping matters. Finding one that solves the problem – breaking the cycle, rather than masking it – is crucial.
Substituting a carrot stick or other behavior for your actual craving (or other form of unhappiness) is a typical method of treatment, but it doesn’t often work, says Brewer, because the feedback loop is still there. Addressing the process itself with other methods (like meditation), which allow you to ride out the craving/unhappiness by attending to it and accepting it, and then letting it go, has been more successful, because it actually breaks the cycle rather than masks it.

What type of coping method do you use?

(via neuroticthought)

Tags: Worth A Read
Quote
"Occasionally, scientists turn everyday beliefs into facts, or explain the workings of intuitively obvious things with their experiments. But facts about the workings of the universe, including the one inside your head, are not necessarily intuitively obvious. Sometimes, intuitions are just wrong—the world seems flat but it is not—and science’s role is to convert these commonsense notions into myths, changing truisms into “old wives’ tales.” Frequently, though, we simply have no prior intuitions about something that scientists discover—there is no reason why we should have deep-seated opinions about the existence of black holes in space, or the importance of sodium, potassium, and calcium in the inner workings of a brain cell. Things that are obvious are not necessarily true, and many things that are true are not at all obvious."

— The Emotional Brain by Joseph LeDoux. (via scipsy)

Text

6.5 Billion part 2 

What I find interesting (as an environmental scientist myself) is that we all want a green solution, how ironic and paradoxical is the idea that the problem identifies an issue, was a resolve but the resolve is within the issue itself, and we are yet to identify it as a whole! 6.5 billion and not one of us wants to stop living to save the planet! Edit: I dont think people can do much of anything to stop it, we can certainly slow it down, but our speed of reproduction (and believe it or not some people are saying that we are not reproducing fast enough, for those ecologists out there I hope your as worried as I am, in the example of island dwelling animals that burst in population size due to lack of competition, gee I wonder what happens to those populations *sorry for the sarcasm, but I firmly believe we will crash as a population when we dry out our resources* ) renders the idea backward. Minimalism wont solve this issue, but I fear the radical ideas myself! This is a conundrum!

greenfuturist:

“Over the past decade, the number of Americans who support the environmental movement has declined, with supporters increasingly split along partisan lines. On the other hand, most Americans strongly support developing clean energy, believe that global warming is an important issue, and regularly engage in behaviors that are good for the environment. At least that’s what we’ve told the researchers. Gallup recently found that 83 percent of Americans want more government support for clean energy. Yale and George Mason University researchers found [PDF] that 72 percent of Americans believe that global warming should be a government priority. And another Gallup poll found that three out of four Americans regularly engage in environmentally friendly behaviors.”

— [Don’t call me an environmentalist | Grist](http://grist.org/green-jobs/dont-call-me-an-environmentalist/)

Text

6.5 Billion!

6.5 BILLION people on this planet by 2050….. if ever a sample size was needed check the planet that orbits 3rd the sun! Wow, it’s interesting how our sample size has opened so many genetic variations too; unfortunately most seem to be inhibiting and “based on deformation compared to a normal human” although that could be the start of a new wave of evolutionary pressure in its development stage.

greenfuturist:

“Among the greatest global population trends is the continued migration of people to cities and their associated metro areas. One estimate has it that by 2050 some 90 percent of global population will live in cities or within an hour of them. Another estimate suggests that today 80 percent of U.S. residents live in cities (bear in mind these numbers often call a town of 20,000 a city) while globally some 51 percent now live in urban areas. The World Health Organization estimates that by 2050 70 percent of the world population or 6.5 billion people will live in urban areas.”

— [Cities hold key to economic future :: Futurist.com: Futurist Speaker Glen Hiemstra](http://www.futurist.com/2012/05/07/cities-hold-key-to-economic-future/)

Photo
When I see images of the human anatomy I can only begin and start wondering what is going to happen to our bodies with new introduced evolutionary pressures. I think they will come strong and fast too, and the reason I believe that is because at current we have learn to built a wall to keep the ones we had under control. We are only holding back what is natural, and I think it will impact us in a big way, and the scale of survival of the fittest is something that will most defiantly be put to the test.
The whole reality of super human powers may not be a concept to distant in our future given our unknown pressures for development, I think our imagination has spurred this already. It’s a prominent reality in our science fiction and non fictions world’s that these abilities naturally occur, and it’s with some grand scheme that we are able to fathom the thoughts, although it’s all entertainment at this stage, the fact that we can see it in our minds (or that some can) and others a willing to accept its nature in our reality (that we allow it to entertain) may not be it’s true identity and purpose!

When I see images of the human anatomy I can only begin and start wondering what is going to happen to our bodies with new introduced evolutionary pressures. I think they will come strong and fast too, and the reason I believe that is because at current we have learn to built a wall to keep the ones we had under control. We are only holding back what is natural, and I think it will impact us in a big way, and the scale of survival of the fittest is something that will most defiantly be put to the test.

The whole reality of super human powers may not be a concept to distant in our future given our unknown pressures for development, I think our imagination has spurred this already. It’s a prominent reality in our science fiction and non fictions world’s that these abilities naturally occur, and it’s with some grand scheme that we are able to fathom the thoughts, although it’s all entertainment at this stage, the fact that we can see it in our minds (or that some can) and others a willing to accept its nature in our reality (that we allow it to entertain) may not be it’s true identity and purpose!

(Source: ddreamscometruee, via scientificillustration)

Tags: Super Powers
Link

neuroticthought:

by Janet Kwasniak

“What exactly is beauty?”, is an old and unanswered question. It is one of those fringe qualia of consciousness – not a perception but a feeling, like familiarity or certainty, which is attached to a perception. But the criteria for this feeling has never been settled. A recent paper by Ishizu and Zeti (citation below) looks for the traces of beauty in the brain. Here is the abstract:

We wanted to learn whether activity in the same area(s) of the brain correlate with the experience of beauty derived from different sources. 21 subjects took part in a brain-scanning experiment using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Prior to the experiment, they viewed pictures of paintings and listened to musical excerpts, both of which they rated on a scale of 1–9, with 9 being the most beautiful. This allowed us to select three sets of stimuli–beautiful, indifferent and ugly–which subjects viewed and heard in the scanner, and rated at the end of each presentation. The results of a conjunction analysis of brain activity showed that, of the several areas that were active with each type of stimulus, only one cortical area, located in the medial orbito-frontal cortex (mOFC), was active during the experience of musical and visual beauty, with the activity produced by the experience of beauty derived from either source overlapping almost completely within it. The strength of activation in this part of the mOFC was proportional to the strength of the declared intensity of the experience of beauty. We conclude that, as far as activity in the brain is concerned, there is a faculty of beauty that is not dependent on the modality through which it is conveyed but which can be activated by at least two sources–musical and visual–and probably by other sources as well. This has led us to formulate a brain-based theory of beauty.

Of course, there are many other areas of the brain involved in beauty but none with the overlap of vision and hearing found in the A1 part of the orbito-frontal cortex. They give a specific location to their area A1 as a reference for other researchers. This seems to be the seat of an abstract sense of beauty. Facial attractiveness activates A1 or very nearby. This is also in the general area associated with pleasure, reward, desire, value evaluation and judgments. The visual and auditory activity in A1 have a different onset after stimulus and so probably do not follow the same path from some other shared area but arrive independently, musical before visual beauty.

The caudate nucleus also is activated with an intensity matching experience of beauty but only for visual not auditory stimuli. This area has been associated with romantic love.

We might expect that if beauty has an abstract area of activation than ugliness would too. Not so, there seems no overlap of visual and auditory ugliness. Ugliness appears tied to particular sorts of ugliness, not a symmetrical opposite of abstract beauty. It is perhaps an emotional reaction involving fear, disgust or similar.

We did not find activity in A1 of mOFC that correlates positively with the experience of ugly stimuli, although ugliness, too, involves a judgment. Instead, the parametrically modulated activity with the experience of ugliness was confined to the amygdala and left somato-motor cortex. This implies that there may be a functional specialization within the brain for at least two different kinds of judgment, those related to positive, rewarding, experiences and those related to negative ones.
Would this idea be stimulated by the movies, when they play nice music for sexy or good people backgrounded by a juxtaposition of camera? compared to the badies for example? Could this be something taught or is it primal? Very interesting :) 
Text

Thats Future!

It is with no reason more than just a push to share some vivid imagery (to the best of my ability) provided by my brain, about what I see the future may be. This will also include serious writings, but may also entail a large portion of humor, all of which will unfortunately be text base unless something appears and I wish to share it as image or otherwise.

Most topics will orientate around population dynamics (boring I know but I have a fascination with the direction our planetary populous is going, and I have some radical ideas I wish to share with people, to see their thoughts and perspectives on the matter, Progression of internet, and where I think our planet is going, and some things that will happen in amongst our everyday lives! 

For now it’s a simple hello! a cup of coffee and some reading; hello! *Sip* *Smile*.